Atopic dermatitis (AD), also known as eczema, is chronic inflammatory skin condition caused by heterogenous factors and manifesting across a range of severities from mild to moderate and severe. AD patients experience periods of flare (worsening of disease symptoms) and periods of remission (fewer symptoms or periods of clear skin). The flare symptoms, including dry skin, rash, skin redness, and pruritis, take a significant toll on the QoL, mental health, and activities of daily life for AD patients. These repeated flare cycles also challenge HCPs to adjust treatment options. For many mild to moderate AD patients, this cycle is a life-long, frustrating journey occurring when standard of care (SOC) topical therapy fails to manage symptoms, or their use is limited by tolerability issues.
SOC treatments for mild to moderate AD include topical forms of corticosteroid, calcineurin inhibitors, and a phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor. The recent approval of a topical Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor holds promise that new treatment options could reduce unmet need and improve the patient journey.
- In mild to moderate AD patients, which QoL factors do you commonly discuss, particularly when flares occur?
- How might a topical JAK inhibitor improve the patient journey for mild to moderate AD patients?
It is true that insurance coverage/access is a key issue for topical JAKs. In my experience, this is not only for this class of medicine but for all branded topical products. In my area of the country , we are able to use specialty pharmacies to help patients with commercial insurance get access to these meds the majority of the time. If it were not for specialty pharmacies, I think access to topical JAks would be far more limited.
This in turn both affects the mental and physical health of the individual. Treatment will need to be based on severity of condition, patient's compliance with agreed upon regimen, and financial ability of individual to pay for newer and more effective medications in the event insurance does not cover treatment. Generally, the typical treatment will begin with topicals and then progress onwards. Steroids can be effective but side effects can cause more issues if used inappropriately. Ie skin bleaching with prolonged inappropriate use. Additionally, certain strengths of topical steroids can not be used on sensitive areas of the body, ie face, limiting effectiveness. New generation of topical meds like PDE4 inhibitors (Eucrisa) and JAK inhibitors (Opzelura) have shown great promise and results but insurance coverage can be difficult at times. Patient also do not want to pay the copays required at times.
Patient also need to follow recommended daily lifestyle/hygiene recommendations to help reduce flares (ie - avoiding prolonged hot showers, using emollients, avoid scratching at lesions etc).
The Topical JAK inhibitors may be a game changer in terms of reducing pruritis as well as overall improvement in AD. I do agree coverage for this will be very challenging.
Facial flares are very concerning.
Eucrisa produces burning in many patients and particularly on the face.
Topical steroids also have problems long term and need to be avoided particularly on the face.
I have used Opzelura which has been very successful in facial flare control in patients as described.
Recently cost / insurance issues addressed.
Apex pharmacy solves many issues and is recommended.
JAK inhibitors work very well for moderate to severe cases and are a great addition to available treatments.
A topical JAK can rapidly treat flares and return patient to a state of good mental and physical health
Topical JAKs help with reducing of proinflammatory mediators; thereby improving physical qnd psychosocial factors.
A topical JAK inhibitor is likely to be a great adjuvant medication during active flare ups with a potential for more long term maintenance usage to prevent flare ups in my opinion. The biggest hindrance is really insurance coverage for it.